Comments on: Kinect vs Playstation Move

By: gizmo

gizmo — Mon, 21 Jun 2010 16:05:41 +0000

The PSmove coiped nintendo the kinect is oringanal whats the point of inventing somthing if its all ready been invented

By: Kinect Fan

Kinect Fan — Fri, 18 Jun 2010 17:21:42 +0000

That makes sense, but if they don’t have a PS3 and move, then you won’t be able to play together. I was just checking Amazon sales stats, and Kinect is killing Move, despite a 50% higher price tag. Don’t know how long it will stay like that, but the top 3 products are Xbox 360 products.

By: Kinect Fan

Kinect Fan — Wed, 16 Jun 2010 23:25:17 +0000

Will it work perfect for every single game type? No. But, Move’s going to have it’s own issues. In order to play with one friend, you’ll have to spend about $150-200. If you want to play with 4 friends at a time, that price will skyrocket, and does Move even have that capability to play with 4 people at time? I know I enjoy playing shooters with my friends, but I don’t want to have to pay $350 in order to do that.

By: Ian

Ian — Wed, 16 Jun 2010 22:23:15 +0000

There’s no way Natal can be better than the Move. How can you play a shooter game without buttons? It just doesn’t work. Sony has the better idea, because you can apply more games to the Move than you can to Natal.

By: Casper

Casper — Mon, 14 Jun 2010 09:03:13 +0000

@Bill Gates
PS Move directly tracks position in space (using the camera), something that the Wii doesn’t do, it can only track motion. The Wii can only extrapolate it’s position in space from the motion it measures, and since there is constantly a margin of error here, the position gets gradually more and more inaccurate. In that sense, PS Move is more accurate than the Wii.

By: J rizzle

J rizzle — Sun, 13 Jun 2010 22:38:15 +0000

My guess is that it will be well beyond 80 dollars, probably somewhere in the 150-200$ range. and, Natal is completely new tech, while the Move is just an idea taken and improved a little

By: ubaid

ubaid — Sat, 12 Jun 2010 22:00:23 +0000

if ps move wer like $50 and xbox natal like $100 i would rather go with natal

By: G STAR

G STAR — Fri, 11 Jun 2010 17:41:02 +0000

it can be better you fool as that was a different time now this is different. dumb ass

By: teabag

teabag — Fri, 28 May 2010 15:44:24 +0000

Natal seems gimmicky even if it had 1:1 tracking, def not for any hardcore gamer doing anything for prolonged time, or anything requiring twitch reflexs…there will be a market for it…but i def think ps3’s move has more realistic applications. wii has terrbile grafx who cares if its 1:1 now

By: Ylper

Ylper — Sat, 15 May 2010 19:31:05 +0000

I’m guessing that the price of Natal as a separate purchase will be pretty high(80$), however it will be (relatively) cheap in combination with an xbox 360.